Followers
A picture from the holocaust that my grandfather put in his scrapbook after returning from the war
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
A picture from the holocaust that my grandfather put in his scrapbook after returning from the war. Might be definitely NSFL.
A picture from the holocaust that my grandfather put in his scrapbook after returning from the war. Might be NSFW. Pile of bodies unable to be cremated
Nazi soldier forced to help bury the dead. A display of Nazi guards' "pastime" activities SS Being forced to assist in burials. studies show that WWIl extensively
shrunken heads elsewhere, but I had never actually I've seen pictures of them until now. Truly monstrous what people have done and are capable of. Sometimes, when l read about/think about WWIl, it feels so long ago, so far away, but in reality, it was 66 years ago, not even one lifetime, a blink of the eye on earth.
The fact that Hitler was alive just brief while ago, that men who fought on all sides of the
Throw your mind back to 1945, the Soviet forces had just defeated the Nazi threat leaving a gigantic power vacuum in central europe; the 'allies' were split with british toryism in charge in the west and the soviet workers army to the east - ideologies weren't going to mesh up in the expected pax-completeum, rows were inevitable but one thing both parties wanted was political control of their new 'empire'; although russia was much more direct when it instated the iron curtain the british empire took equal measures to protect it's new'friends' / 'assets' mostly by installing friendly parties as
puppet dictatorships. The western empire and the soviet post war gambit depended on being the heroic saviour from the demonlike nazi's - this is why it was vitally important to Britain (who remember still had huge mortality rates in their Jewish concentration camps at this point (1946) and the Soviets (who had carried out genocides of their own) to paint the Nazi's as demoniacally evil as possible - The americans of course still had to sell the morality of the war to an american public whod never wanted to join in the first place and weren't entirely happy during the process.
Just a quick note, remember that from many global perspectives the British who'd invented the concentration camp only forty years before to help with the wholesale murder of Boar men, women and children didn't really have a moral leg to stand on - Lord Kitchener the war criminal behind these atrocities was a part of the very same British establishment Churchill was from, indeed Churchill himself had served under Kitchener in Sudan where barbarous offences such as the desecration of the Mahdi's grave.
Further while it was well publicised
Churchill had written to his mother
the immortal lines Our victory was
disgraced by the inhuman slaughter
of the wounded and Lord Kitchener
was responsible for this.' it was
also fairly well known in non-british
media that he'd said 'l am strongly in
favour of using poisoned gas against
uncivilised tribes.' and a rather
cagey secret that he'd written 'I may
certainly have to ask you to support
me in using poison gas. We could
drench the cities of the Ruhr and
many other cities in Germany in such
a way that most of the population
would be requiring constant medical
attention. during the ww2 - certainly
the moral argument might have been
a tricky one were all things to be
considered, lucky for britain no one
wanted to consider all things.
Various bodies within various
establishments grabbed onto
any rumour and blew it out of all
proportions, they paid great sums
of money for evidence which would
make the show case world spectacle
Nuremberg trial as definitive and hard
hitting as possible.
This is how come Andreas Pfaffenberger's statement
was taken as gospel despite
contradictions and absurdities
(claiming to have personally
witnessed someone murder despite
them still being alive), Albert G.
Rosenberg who lead a special
intelligence team called 'Publicity
and Psychological Warfare unit'
and later 'information control' was
instrumental forwarding the physical
evidence which was apparently
retrieved from Buchenwald Camp,
much can be said about his
objectivițy and the credence of his
work, that's before you look at his
lifestyle.
An unreliable source seeming to
confirm another unreliable source
isn't exactly the thing of historical
reliability - certainly when we consider
one was an aspiring young US Army
Propagandist no doubt eager to
please and the other was a POW no
doubt eager to please... To make
matters Worse at the Trial justice
Jackson made 'mistakes' concerning
certain key factS which were neve
addressed, when the veracity of
the Pfaffenberger testimony is
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment